![]() The biggest hurdle for AMD right now stems from the partner boards which are still below par when it comes to memory support (in this case an MSI X370 XPower Gaming Titanium).įinally, the site also confirmed the release date (April 11th), and the pricing for the entire Ryzen 5 family (in Euros), estimating an approximate upmark of 15% over US pricing: There is one serious caveat to take into consideration in the review: the reviewer, despite his best intentions, had to lower the RAM speed to get four slots to work together, and user testing has proved that memory speed and latency hold a huge sway on performance on Ryzen. You can find the graphs below, sourced from : 4K gaming did level out the playing field by putting the load on the GPU, making the CPU hardly break a sweat and generally proved that 4K is irrelevant (right now) to demonstrate Ryzen's CPU performance. 1080p gaming revealed a competitive, albeit lower overall, performance than the Intel offering. The review confirmed that benchmarks that rely on core count revealed the true power of the CPU, with its 6 cores / 12 threads really pulling ahead of Intel in just about every scenario, while memory benchmarks showed some dodgy latency (several levels worse than some A8 and A10 APUs and almost twice as much as an i7-4770K) with average read/write speeds. In purely synthetic benchmarks like wPrime and CPU-Z, which leverage the number of cores, the Ryzen 5 scored well above Intel's quadcores, but naturally fell short of the 8-core/16-thread 1700X. The reviewed unit came equipped with an AMD Wraith cooler.įacing off against several Core i7 and i5 CPUs, as well as a Ryzen 7 1700X, the Ryseems to provide some amount of surprise, in particular against its Ryzen 7 big brother, generally matching its performance core-for-core. Sitting shy of the top SKU (the 1600X), the 1600 clocks in at 3.2GHz, with 3.6GHz boost and, as a two-CCX design, it carries the full 16MB of 元 cache that we can see on the higher-end Ryzen 7 CPUs. First thing's first: the Ryis not the highest-performing chip in the AMD Ryzen 5 stable. Unbound by the restraints of non-disclosure, Iván Martinez of, took the retail version of the Rythrough the paces and saw some interesting results, further confirming that AMD's Ryzen has its good and its bad sides. The review is fairly comprehensive too, showing AMD's affordable 6-core in a wide range of benchmark tests. I went ahead and attached a screenshot of the memory timings using Ryzen Timing Checker.It looks like someone broke the Ryzen 5 street date as a Spanish site this week published an early review for the R圜PU, using a retail sample obtained prior to the official release. It's a lot of trial and error for me, mostly error. I mean, you have Samsung B-die and that's the fun of having it and half the reason it costs more. Strange.Īnyway, yes, I think it will definitely be worth it to tweak your memory. I'm wondering if it somehow picked up my previous saved R15 score, converted it (somehow), and displayed it in the results. Somehow, there was already a 2700X result showing up when I ran it both yesterday and this time, but I know that wasn't from me and I don't see it in anyone else's screenshot. ![]() Side note - I had run R20 yesterday and scored exactly what you did for multi-core, but I don't remember what the single-core score was (and I forgot to check the box to save best score). It kept temps about 5-10☌ cooler than the NH-U14S, which still does an admirable job (but that 7700K gets really hot, so I switched it back). I ran my 2700X for a while with my Noctua NH-D15 before switching it back to the 7700K and my scores might be a little higher if I was still using it. Better cooling will do wonders for Ryzen, especially 2nd gen, and that may be what's holding your 2700X back the most. Yeah, you may be right about the VRM on your motherboard, but it's obviously not affecting it too much. Silverstone ST-12W 80+ Platinum, The best 1kw+ PSU that meet ATX spec (14cm length)ġ838 FIDE rating (has been inactive since 2010). NZXT H440 White modded front and top panel for better airflow. Transcend PCIE 220S 1TB, Seagate Barracuda 4TBĪcer XR341CK 3440x1440 30-75Hz G-Sync compatible calibrated by X-Rite i1 Display Pro Plus HWlabs Nemesis GTS 360 and GTX 240 / 3x Gentle Typhoon AP-15 1850 RPM / 3x EK Vardar / SC600 pumpĢx16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3600 4666Mhz 16-16-16-38 34ns AIDA latency 1.615V + EK MonarchĮVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + universal waterblock underclock 1721Mhz 0.8V 12488 mem(140W during gaming) ![]() Delidded i9-10900KF OCTVB + V/F 5.3x10 5.4x8 5.5x2 adaptive volt +Supercool direct die waterblock
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |